ArticleScientific reports2026
Mental imagery modulates bistable perception in a modality-specific manner.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal approaches are essential for understanding the mechanisms and constraints of mental imagery, yet few studies have directly compared its perceptual effects across sensory systems. This study explored how mental imagery influences bistable perception in vision and audition by comparing imagery-based and sensory-based priming in binocular rivalry and auditory streaming. In auditory streaming, an acoustic bias promoting segregation increased the likelihood of an early segregated percept, whereas an imagery priming did not. Binocular rivalry exhibited robust and asymmetric priming effects within the first few seconds, with both imagery and physical cues biasing perceptual onset. While both physical and imagery priming significantly influenced the initial percept in binocular rivalry, only physical priming affected perceptual reports in auditory streaming. Notably, the strength of imagery priming in vision correlated with self-reported imagery vividness, supporting the functional relevance of individual differences in mental imagery. These findings indicate that imagery can bias visual perception but may have limited influence in audition under current task constraints, likely due to modality-specific dynamics and early integration biases. This study provides behavioural evidence for the modality-specific impact of mental imagery and underscores the value of cross-modal designs in understanding how internal representations shape conscious perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.