ArticleCommunications engineering2026
Adaptive robot guidance through real-time compliance estimation and dual-modal control.
Article in Communications engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When human instructors guide learners through motor tasks, they seamlessly coordinate physical touch with verbal explanations - a dance teacher positions a student's arms while describing the movement, a therapist supports a patient's limb while offering encouragement. In contrast, a robot applying physical forces without verbal context can feel invasive or unsettling to humans. We present a robot guidance controller that learns to coordinate physical and verbal guidance as human instructors naturally do. Our system adaptively balances these modalities based on real-time estimation of human compliance: when learners struggle, it provides firmer physical corrections with explicit instructions; as they improve, it transitions to lighter touch with encouraging phrases. Our method comprises three components: (1) an estimator that infers physical and verbal compliance from tracking errors, (2) an optimization method that dynamically allocates guidance between force and language, and (3) a force-to-language model that generates contextually appropriate utterances. User studies (N=12) demonstrate that adaptive coordination of guidance significantly outperforms single-modality guidance and fixed-combination baselines: up to 50% reduction in tracking error, 39% improvement in movement smoothness, and 27% faster task completion. While validated in rehabilitation therapy, our approach generalizes to any human-robot collaborative learning scenario.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.