ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable AI (XAI) for transparent resource allocation in public safety communications networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Public Safety Networks (PSNs) play a crucial role in enabling efficient communication and coordination among first responders and emergency management agencies during critical situations such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, and public health crises. These networks must facilitate timely and reliable data transmission to ensure informed decision-making in dynamic and high-pressure environments. However, effective resource allocation within PSNs is a challenging task due to fluctuating demands, limited bandwidth, and the need for real-time adaptability. Traditional AI-based allocation models, while capable of optimizing resource distribution, often function as black-box systems, offering little transparency into the decision-making process. The lack of explainability in these models raises concerns among stakeholders, as opaque AI-driven decisions may result in inefficiencies, biases, or unintended disparities in resource allocation. To address these challenges, this study presents an XAI-driven framework for resource allocation that integrates SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) to enhance both global and local interpretability. By leveraging these techniques, the proposed model improves transparency, ensures fairness, and provides interpretable justifications for allocation decisions. Furthermore, Bayesian uncertainty modeling is incorporated to enhance decision reliability, particularly in rapidly evolving emergency scenarios. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that the framework optimizes resource distribution while maintaining explainability, fostering trust among emergency responders, policymakers, and stakeholders. By bridging the gap between AI-driven optimization and human interpretability, this research contributes to the advancement of equitable, accountable, and transparent decision-making processes in PSNs, ultimately improving emergency response efficiency and public safety outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.