ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2026
Enhancing chemical safety information for the future.
Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The safe manufacture, transport and use of chemicals - in short, the entire chemistry enterprise - depends on high-quality chemical safety information. That information must be accurate, audience-appropriate, comprehensive and based on data derived from research. The globally harmonized system of classification and labelling has standardized how chemical hazards are determined by manufacturers and then communicated to users through the use of labels and safety data sheets, but it has not been globally adopted. To lower risk to acceptable levels, users of chemicals rely on authoritative information to complete risk assessments. Safety data sheets are important tools, but they are merely a starting point for the risk assessment process - they can be insufficiently detailed, poorly curated and difficult to search. There is also an unrealistic expectation that users have the appropriate competencies to apply the information to risk-based safety principles such as RAMP (recognize hazards, assess risks, minimize risks and prepare for emergencies). The primary emphasis of this article is to raise awareness of persistent challenges with accessing and applying chemical safety information and to present a call to action for key stakeholders and expert groups to address these issues.
Identifiers
41857151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.