ArticleScientific reports2026
Precipitation-aware sensor ecosystem modelling for performance-driven autonomous vehicle navigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a precipitation-aware sensor ecosystem modelling framework designed to enhance autonomous vehicle (AV) navigation under adverse weather. By integrating spatiotemporal radar-based precipitation nowcasting, deep neural network-based sensor degradation modelling, and adaptive probabilistic sensor fusion, the system dynamically adjusts LiDAR, RADAR, and camera inputs according to precipitation severity and sensor reliability. The proposed framework is evaluated against a fixed-weight baseline detector with uniform multi-sensor fusion under identical training and hardware conditions. On 4.5 TB of multi-modal sensor data collected over 320 driving hours across five precipitation conditions, the framework achieved a 31.2% increase in detection precision, a 27.8% reduction in false positives, and a reduction in mean perception latency from 51 to 43 ms. Radar-based rainfall estimation yielded a mean absolute error of 0.42 mm/h with [Formula: see text]. Key metrics are reported as mean ± standard deviation over repeated evaluation runs and are further summarized with class-wise Average Precision and statistical variability in the Results section. The dataset used in this study is a custom multi-modal dataset collected during the project and is available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.