ArticleScientific reports2026
Thermofluid and exergy characteristics of MoS
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) assessment of a flat‑plate solar collector operating with MoS2/water nanofluids at concentrations of 0%, 0.5%, and 1% under the high‑irradiance climatic conditions of Ahvaz, Iran. A validated transient numerical model is employed to evaluate the system’s monthly performance over a full annual cycle, yielding a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 16.42 W and a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 2.12%. The results indicate that the 1 vol% nanofluid consistently enhances thermal performance, increasing the useful energy gain by up to 13% and the collector outlet temperature by 20% during winter months. Exergy analysis reveals notable improvements, with exergy output and exergy efficiency increasing by up to 20 and 22%, respectively, alongside a 6–7% reduction in exergy destruction. From an economic standpoint, the system achieves a minimum Levelized Cost of Heat (LCOH) of 0.77 $/kWh in June, while the specific exergy cost is reduced by 3–5% through nanoparticle addition. Environmentally, the 1 vol% nanofluid yields the highest avoided CO2 emissions (up to 44 kg/month) and improves both the Environmental Index and the Environmental–Energetic Efficiency. Moreover, the Solar Utilization Ratio (SUR) increases by 10–13% on an annual basis. Overall, the findings demonstrate that MoS2‑based nanofluids offer substantial thermodynamic, economic, and environmental advantages, confirming their suitability for flat‑plate solar collectors operating in high‑irradiance regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.