ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification and evaluation of tumor pyroptosis-associated antigens for design a vaccine candidate against lung cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, emphasizing the need for innovative therapeutic strategies. This study utilized immunoinformatics and structural bioinformatics approaches to design and evaluate a multi-epitope vaccine targeting pyroptosis-associated antigens (CARD8, NAIP, NLRP1, and NLRP3), which are implicated in lung cancer immunology. Fifteen T-cell and B-cell epitopes were identified, analyzed for their antigenicity, non-toxicity, non-allergenicity, and immune-stimulatory potential, and optimized to construct a vaccine with suitable adjuvants and linkers. The vaccine demonstrated high antigenicity, solubility, and stability, as validated through physicochemical analyses. Its three-dimensional structure was modeled, refined, and validated using molecular modeling approaches. Molecular docking studies revealed stable and strong interactions between the vaccine and key immune receptors (TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8), indicating its potential to activate both innate and adaptive immunity. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed the vaccine's structural stability and solvent accessibility over 100 ns across ten replicas. Immune simulations demonstrated strong immunogenic responses, including elevated antibody titers, memory cell populations, and cytokine production. Codon optimization and in silico cloning further ensured efficient expression in Escherichia coli, facilitating experimental application. These findings underscore the vaccine's promise as a therapeutic candidate against lung cancer, warranting further in vitro and in vivo investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.