ArticleNature communications2026
Genomic inference of sites of transmission during regional spread of bla
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The frequent movement of colonized and infected patients between healthcare facilities makes it challenging to discern where individual patients acquire healthcare-associated pathogens, and in turn, identify facilities making the greatest contributions to regional spread. Here, we implement an approach using genomic and healthcare exposure histories from passively collected regional isolates to identify the putative facility source for each new isolate by analyzing shared healthcare exposures with earlier case patients whose isolates were phylogenetically closest. As a proof of principle, we apply this approach to data collected by a state health department during a suspected regional outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae involving 72 patients exposed to 47 healthcare facilities in Michigan from October 2019 to May 2022. Examination of transmission linkages supported a sustained role played by a single focal facility, with other facilities inferred as sources of smaller numbers of cases. Importantly, in several instances, facilities were implicated as sites of transmission prior to cases being detected there, based on overlapping exposures among genomically linked cases. The ability to infer facility sources of transmission using passively collected regional isolates supports the potential for real-time genome-informed surveillance to enable timely targeting of interventions to interrupt regional spread of healthcare-associated pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.