ArticleNature communications2026
Intrinsic stabilization of synaptic plasticity improves learning and robustness in artificial neural networks.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synaptic plasticity, defined as the ability of connections between neurons to strengthen or weaken over time, is essential for learning, yet unregulated plasticity can lead to instability. Inspired by biological feedback mechanisms, we propose a framework that stabilizes synaptic changes in artificial neural networks through top-down signals derived from the network's own output. The model, termed intrinsic Top-Down Stabilization (iTDS), augments traditional supervised learning by introducing a slower, top-down signal that tracks the network's output over time and modulates synaptic updates. Instead of directly influencing sensory inputs, these top-down signals guide synaptic plasticity by gradually aligning with ongoing network activity. We demonstrate that this simple mechanism improves training efficiency, enhances generalization, and increases resilience to noise perturbations. The approach is evaluated across recurrent, feedforward, and reservoir networks on 16 synthetic and real-world tasks, including temporal signal encoding, synthetic data categorization, handwritten character recognition, and image classification. Our results clarify how network activity influences the alignment of top-down signals with supervised learning, providing testable predictions for how feedback projections can stabilize learning in biological networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.