ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction to Improve End-Diastolic and Systolic Cardiac T1 Mapping.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop an image reconstruction method that enables increased spatial resolution cardiac T1 mapping in both the end-diastolic and systolic phase, that shows high T1 agreement with the clinical standard. The resolution gain is achieved by increasing the acceleration rate of MOLLI single-shot images to R = 4, while maintaining a sufficiently short acquisition window.
methodsA modified end-to-end variational network (MappingVN) is proposed. The modifications include a re-ordered sheared-grid sampling pattern, 2D + contrast convolutions and the use of patchwise squeeze-and-excitation layers. The method was evaluated in terms of image quality and T1 agreement with reference MOLLI T1 maps using retrospectively undersampled patient data. Furthermore, the method was additionally evaluated in a prospective setting comparing high-resolution T1 maps (1.14 × 1.14 mm
resultsThe MappingVN showed improved SSIM scores of 0.95 and 0.98 on 1.5T and 3 T compared to 0.93 and 0.96 for GRAPPA. In high-resolution end-diastolic T1 maps stronger T1 agreement (MappingVN: -3 ± 69 ms on 1.5T, -11 ± 70 ms on 3T, GRPPA: -9 ± 129 ms on 1.5T, 14 ± 106 ms) could be observed. For systolic T1 mapping the MappingVN reduced the occurrence of motion artifacts.
conclusionThe proposed method enables high spatial resolution cardiac T1 mapping in both end-diastolic and systolic phases. Resulting maps show good T1 agreement with the clinical standard and may improve the visibility of small focal lesions while reducing partial volume effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.