Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41856928›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2026

Prognostic Significance of MSI and EBV Positivity in PD-L1 Positive Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fausto Petrelli, Maria Antista, Antonio Ghidini, Valentina Rampulla, Lorenzo Dottorini, Andrea Celotti, Fulvia Milena Cribiu, Barbara Galassi, Ornella Garrone, Alberto Zaniboni and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fausto PetrelliOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9639-4486
Maria AntistaOncology Unit, ASST Crema, Crema, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6153-1863
Antonio GhidiniOncology Unit, Casa di Cura Igea, Milano, Italy.
Valentina RampullaSurgery Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy.
Lorenzo DottoriniOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy.
Andrea CelottiSurgery Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-0684
Fulvia Milena CribiuPathology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy.
Barbara GalassiOncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Ornella GarroneOncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Alberto ZaniboniOncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Gianluca TomaselloOncology Unit, ASST Crema, Crema, Italy.
Michele GhidiniOncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMicrosatellite instability (MSI), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity are emerging biomarkers in gastric cancer prognosis and treatment selection, particularly in immunotherapy. This review evaluates their prognostic significance through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsRelevant studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (January 2010 to December 2024) were analyzed. Studies included assessing MSI, PD-L1, and EBV status in gastric cancer using immunohistochemistry, PCR, or in situ hybridization, and reported outcomes such as overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or progression-free survival. Data extraction adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and pooled analyses were conducted using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method). Heterogeneity was assessed using I

resultsA total of 25 studies involving 6494 patients were reviewed. In localized gastric cancer, MSI-high status was associated with significantly improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.75; p = 0.004) but showed no significant impact on OS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48-1.28; p = 0.33) compared to microsatellite stable/PD-L1-negative tumors. EBV-positive/PD-L1-positive cancers demonstrated a prognosis similar to EBV-negative/PD-L1-negative cases (OS: HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.81-1.45; p = 0.59).

conclusionsIn metastatic disease, MSI and EBV status were not associated with significant prognostic effects. MSI and EBV status have minimal prognostic value in gastric cancer, particularly for OS, but are essential for selecting candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Standardizing biomarker evaluation is critical to enhancing their clinical relevance.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHerpesvirus 4, HumanMicrosatellite InstabilityStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanEBVgastric cancermeta‐analysisMSIPD‐L1prognosis

Identifiers

PMID41856928
PMCPMC13093534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.