Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41856798›Full record

ArticleJournal of chest surgery2026

Detection of Anastomotic Leaks Following Esophagectomy with Cervical Anastomosis Using Drain Fluid Amylase Testing: A Retrospective Study in Taiwan.

Ying-Che Ting, Ling-I Chien, Chia Liu, Yi-Ying Lee, Chien-Sheng Huang, Yu-Chung Wu, Po-Kuei Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying-Che TingDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5350-7942
Ling-I ChienDepartment of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4745-7114
Chia LiuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0284-3570
Yi-Ying LeeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Sheng HuangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-2869
Yu-Chung WuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-3184
Po-Kuei HsuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-0227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak at the cervical anastomosis following esophagectomy remains a significant problem. However, diagnostic accuracy for this condition is limited, and interpretation varies. This study aimed to share our institution's experience regarding the diagnostic value of esophagram and drain fluid amylase testing. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with esophageal cancer who underwent McKeown esophagectomy. Esophagram was scheduled on postoperative day (POD) 7. Drain fluid amylase levels were measured twice, on POD 3 and POD 7. Diagnostic criteria were established based on the values measured at these time points and the relationship between them. Results: Overall, 103 patients were eligible for evaluation. Of these, 48 underwent drain fluid amylase testing, 67 underwent esophagram, and 12 received both examinations. The sensitivity and specificity of esophagram for detecting anastomotic leak were 28.6% and 95%, respectively. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 40.0%, 91.9%, and 88.1%, respectively. Among patients who underwent drain fluid amylase testing, the criteria for detecting leaks were defined as follows: (1) an increasing trend (i.e., an amylase level higher on POD 7 than on POD 3) and (2) an amylase level >80 IU/L on POD 7. The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were 75% and 96.5%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 75% and 96.5%. The diagnostic accuracy was 93.9%. Conclusion: Compared with esophagram, drain fluid amylase testing is easier to perform and may represent a more accurate method for predicting anastomotic leak.

Indexed as

AmylasesAnastomotic leakEsophagram

Identifiers

PMID41856798
PMCPMC13351375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.