ArticleeNeuro2026
Spatial Adaptation of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells Between Artificial and Natural Stimuli.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The retina encodes a broad range of stimuli, adapting its computations to features like brightness, contrast, and motion. However, it is unclear whether it also adapts when switching between natural scenes and white noise (WN). To address this, we analyzed the neural activity of male marmoset retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in response to WN and naturalistic movies. We trained linear-nonlinear models on both stimuli, evaluated their performance, and compared their receptive fields across stimulus domains. We found that models with spatial filters trained on one stimulus ensemble were less accurate when predicting neural activity on the other compared to models trained directly on the target stimulus. This suggests that spatial processing adapts to stimulus statistics. Different RGC types exhibited distinct changes: The OFF midget cells' receptive fields became enlarged under natural movies (NMs), resulting in a lower cutoff frequency. Parasol cells and large OFF cells did not significantly change their receptive field sizes. All cell types exhibited stronger surrounds under NMs, resembling the whitening filters predicted by efficient coding for stimulus decorrelation, prompting us to test whether these changes were related to the different spectral content of the two stimulus types. Quantifying the effects of the filters' enhanced surrounds on the stimulus power spectrum showed a significant contribution toward whitening only in ON parasol cells, where a whitening effect emerged regardless of the training stimulus. These results suggest that while RGCs adapt to the differences between WN and NM stimuli, efficient coding can only partially account for this adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.