Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41856791›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

Spatial Adaptation of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells Between Artificial and Natural Stimuli.

Michaela Vystrčilová, Shashwat Sridhar, Max F Burg, Mohammad H Khani, Dimokratis Karamanlis, Helene M Schreyer, Varsha Ramakrishna, Steffen Krüppel, Sören J Zapp, Matthias Mietsch and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michaela VystrčilováUniversity of Göttingen, Institute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, Göttingen 37037, Germany.
Shashwat SridharDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.
Max F BurgUniversity of Göttingen, Institute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, Göttingen 37037, Germany.
Mohammad H KhaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.
Dimokratis KaramanlisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9469-5020
Helene M SchreyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.
Varsha RamakrishnaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.
Steffen KrüppelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2773-6785
Sören J ZappDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0836-1663
Matthias MietschLaboratory Animal Science Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Tim GollischDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-533X
Alexander S EckerUniversity of Göttingen, Institute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, Göttingen 37037, Germany ecker@cs.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2392-5105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retina encodes a broad range of stimuli, adapting its computations to features like brightness, contrast, and motion. However, it is unclear whether it also adapts when switching between natural scenes and white noise (WN). To address this, we analyzed the neural activity of male marmoset retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in response to WN and naturalistic movies. We trained linear-nonlinear models on both stimuli, evaluated their performance, and compared their receptive fields across stimulus domains. We found that models with spatial filters trained on one stimulus ensemble were less accurate when predicting neural activity on the other compared to models trained directly on the target stimulus. This suggests that spatial processing adapts to stimulus statistics. Different RGC types exhibited distinct changes: The OFF midget cells' receptive fields became enlarged under natural movies (NMs), resulting in a lower cutoff frequency. Parasol cells and large OFF cells did not significantly change their receptive field sizes. All cell types exhibited stronger surrounds under NMs, resembling the whitening filters predicted by efficient coding for stimulus decorrelation, prompting us to test whether these changes were related to the different spectral content of the two stimulus types. Quantifying the effects of the filters' enhanced surrounds on the stimulus power spectrum showed a significant contribution toward whitening only in ON parasol cells, where a whitening effect emerged regardless of the training stimulus. These results suggest that while RGCs adapt to the differences between WN and NM stimuli, efficient coding can only partially account for this adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalRetinal Ganglion CellsSpace PerceptionAction PotentialsAnimalsCallithrixMaleModels, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsPhotic StimulationVisual FieldsLN modelsreceptive fieldsretinal ganglion cellsstimulus adaptation

Identifiers

PMID41856791
PMCPMC13138850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.