ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Diagnostic Value of EBUS-guided Transbronchial MEdiastinal Cryobiopsy versus ConvenTIONal Bronchoscopic Approaches for Intrathoracic Stage I/II SARcoidosis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (DETECTION-SAR-II).
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07246876 (Diagnostic Value of EBUS-Guided Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy Versus Conventional Bronchoscopic Approaches for Stage I/II Sarcoidosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Value of EBUS-Guided Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy Versus Conventional Bronchoscopic Approaches for Stage I/II Sarcoidosis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSarcoidosis frequently involves intrathoracic lymph nodes and lung parenchyma and requires histological confirmation for diagnosis. Although endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is recommended for obtaining mediastinal samples, its diagnostic yield frequently necessitates additional transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and/or endobronchial biopsy (EBB). EBUS transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBMC) can yield larger, well-preserved tissue samples than EBUS-TBNA alone. However, whether EBUS-TBMC alone is equivalent to conventional multimodal sampling (EBUS-TBNA combined with TBLB and/or EBB), and whether TBLB and EBB provide incremental diagnostic value when added to EBUS-TBMC, is still unclear. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study, 410 patients with suspected stage I/II sarcoidosis will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the EBUS-TBMC or EBUS-TBNA group. All participants will then undergo TBLB and EBB. The primary outcome will be the granuloma detection rate. The diagnostic sensitivity, negative predictive value and procedure-related complications will be selected for secondary outcomes. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS V.24.0, with non-inferior testing for the primary comparison. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval for this DETECTION-SAR-II trial was obtained by the China-Japan Friendship Hospital Ethics Committee (Ethics number: 2025-KY-075). Participants will be fully informed of objectives, protocol and potential risks of the study before enrolment and will provide written informed consent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07246876.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.