ReviewOpen heart2026
Beyond the tear: the enduring role of aortic pathology in the era of genomic medicine.
Review in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thoracic aortic dissection is often approached as an acute and localised event, and pathological examination has traditionally focused on the dissected segment. In daily practice, however, most clinicians recognise that the dissection itself is rarely the starting point of disease. Structural abnormalities of the aortic wall are frequently present long before rupture occurs and may extend well beyond the site of failure.At the same time, the diagnostic landscape of thoracic aortic disease is changing rapidly. Advances in genetic and molecular techniques have increased the detection of potentially disease-causing variants, but their clinical interpretation remains challenging. In this setting, histopathological examination of the aortic wall provides essential phenotypic context and continues to play a key role in recognising and interpreting genetic disease. The value of pathology, however, depends strongly on the representativeness of the sampled tissue.In this Brief Communication, we discuss why routine reliance on dissected aortic tissue may be insufficient to characterise the underlying disease process. We argue for a more deliberate approach to tissue selection, with attention to macroscopically intact aortic segments, and highlight the importance of standardised reporting and appropriate biobanking infrastructure. Despite ongoing advances in genomic medicine, careful pathological examination of the aorta remains a cornerstone in understanding thoracic aortopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.