ArticleBMJ open2026
Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard ropivacaine for pain control in adults receiving continuous supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks for open elbow arthrolysis: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority clinical trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOpen elbow arthrolysis effectively treats post-traumatic elbow stiffness, but severe postoperative pain during early rehabilitation impedes recovery. Continuous brachial plexus blocks, though effective, face limitations such as catheter displacement and infection risks. Liposomal bupivacaine, an ultra-long-acting local anaesthetic, offers prolonged analgesia and may circumvent these challenges. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of a single-dose liposomal bupivacaine supraclavicular block versus continuous ropivacaine infusion in patients undergoing open elbow arthrolysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial will enrol 72 adults (ASA I-III,the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification for preoperative risk) scheduled for open elbow release surgery. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either a single supraclavicular block with 10 mL liposomal bupivacaine plus 10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine followed by saline infusion (liposomal bupivacaine group) or continuous catheter infusion with 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine followed by 0.2% ropivacaine infusion (control group). The primary outcome is the weighted area under the curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores during functional exercises within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include resting NRS scores, sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), rehabilitation metrics (range of motion, grip strength), recovery quality (Quality of Recovery -15) and long-term functional outcomes (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, Quick-DASH scores) at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Non-inferiority will be established if the upper 95% confidence limit of the AUC difference is ≤1.3. Statistical analyses will employ intention-to-treat principles with SPSS V.24.0. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Ethics Committee (K2025-213-00). The trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500103911). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, contributing evidence on liposomal bupivacaine's role in perioperative analgesia and rehabilitation for elbow surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR ID provided on acceptance).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.