Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41856577›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2026

Excitatory amino acid inhibitors in adults with acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marwan Bouras, Olivier Costerousse, Michael Verret, Sarah O'connor, Ryan Zarychanski, Marc-Aurèle Gagnon, Tomas H Torkomyan, Antoine Ouellet, Francois Lauzier, Shane English and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marwan BourasCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Olivier CosterousseCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Michael VerretCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3257-7878
Sarah O'connorCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Ryan ZarychanskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sections of Critical Care Medicine, of Hematology and of Medical Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Marc-Aurèle GagnonCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Tomas H TorkomyanCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Antoine OuelletCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Francois LauzierCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Shane EnglishClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lynne MooreCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Alexis F TurgeonCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada alexis.turgeon@fmed.ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5675-8791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of early administration of excitatory amino acid (EAA) inhibitors on long-term neurological outcomes in adults with acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 2026. STUDY SELECTION: RCTs comparing EAA inhibitors with placebo, standard care or any other interventions were included. Trials enrolled adult patients (≥18 years) with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12) receiving the intervention within the acute phase of care (first week). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Pairs of reviewers independently screened trials, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias (RoB) with the Cochrane RoB tool 2 and graded the certainty of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Random effects models were used for all effect measures and trial sequential analyses (TSA) were performed for each outcome.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was long-term neurological function at 6 months (or the nearest earlier time point), assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or extended version (GOS-E), using the classical definitions of an unfavourable outcome (GOS 1-3 or GOS-E 1-4).

results28 trials enrolling 4238 patients were included. Early administration of EAA inhibitors was not associated with reduced unfavourable neurological outcomes (relative risk 0.93 (95% CI (0.84 to 1.03); I²=40%; 15 trials, n=3613, moderate certainty). No statistically significant difference was observed based on EAA inhibitor type, timing or duration of administration, RoB or TBI severity. Mortality, intensive care unit lengths of stay and mean intracranial pressure were not statistically different between groups, but hospital length of stay was reduced in the EAA inhibitors group. The early use of EAA inhibitors was not associated with adverse events (low certainty). TSA showed insufficient power for the primary outcome.

conclusionsIn adults with moderate to severe TBI, the early administration of EAA inhibitors was not associated with a reduction of unfavourable neurological outcomes. Further high-quality and adequately powered RCTs are required to clarify their role in TBI management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42025635527.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticAdultGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBrain InjuriesINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREMeta-AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID41856577
PMCPMC13007133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.