ReviewRMD open2026
Anifrolumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: real-world evidence from a Spanish multicentre cohort of 206 patients and literature review.
Review in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Anifrolumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, Extension Studies, and Real-World Cohorts.Pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Anifrolumab in Egyptian Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
65 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnifrolumab is approved for adults with moderate-to-severe active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on Randomised clinical trials (RCTs). While randomised pivotal RCTs have demonstrated their efficacy and safety, real-world evidence (RWE) remains limited.
objectivesTo describe the clinical characteristics, effectiveness and safety of anifrolumab in clinical practice and to assess findings from published observational studies.
methodsMulticentre study of patients with SLE classified according to EULAR/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019. Data were collected from medical records up to 30 April 2025. Variables included demographic characteristics, clinical and serological features, prior and concomitant therapies, disease activity indices including the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA), damage and disease control measures including the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR Damage Index, Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and Definitions of Remission in SLE (DORIS) remission and the association with adverse events (AEs). A review of published observational studies was also conducted.
resultsWe included 206 patients (183 women; mean age 44.6±12.6 years) from 54 Spanish centres. The most common indications for anifrolumab were cutaneous (61.7%), musculoskeletal (48.5%) and haematological (27.2%).A rapid and sustained improvement was observed in disease activity (SLEDAI-2K, SLE-DAS, PGA), LLDAS, DORIS remission, serological markers (anti-double-stranded DNA, C3/C4) and corticosteroid tapering. Organ damage remained stable. After a mean follow-up of 7.5±5.3 months, the most frequent AEs were herpes zoster (n= 5), respiratory infections (n= 6) and headache (n= 3). Twenty patients discontinued treatment. These results were consistent with published observational studies.
conclusionIn this large RWE cohort, anifrolumab demonstrated early and sustained clinical benefit, a favourable safety profile and a significant corticosteroid-sparing effect. These findings reinforce the evidence from CT and support the incorporation of anifrolumab into routine care for patients with SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.