ArticleJournal of medical genetics2026
Comprehensive evidence for the pathogenicity of the
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe
methodsWe conducted a nationwide study using the national Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer registry. Pathogenicity was assessed through quantitative cosegregation analysis, a systematic review of functional and clinical evidence and evaluation of variant frequency in population databases. Evidence was integrated using the ClinGen ENIGMA
resultsWe identified 44 carriers from 35 distinct Japanese families. Quantitative cosegregation analysis yielded a combined likelihood ratio of approximately 60, satisfying the PP1_Strong criterion. This was supported by robust evidence from multiple functional studies, including Mixed-All-Nominated-in-One-BRCA, homology-directed repair and saturation genome editing assays (PS3) and a reported case of Fanconi anaemia (PM3_Moderate). This variant is rare, with an allele frequency of 6.20×10
conclusionBy integrating newly collected genetic data with functional and clinical evidence, we provide robust support for reclassifying the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.