ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Realistic simulation: construction and validation of scenarios for stroke recognition in prehospital care.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From validation to impact: the unfinished agenda of prehospital stroke care.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, requiring rapid and accurate recognition, especially in the context of prehospital care.To construct, validate, and produce simulated scenarios for teaching and learning about the care of stroke victims in prehospital settings.The present is a methodological, descriptive, and quantitative study involving the development of two simulated scenario scripts based on best simulation practices and Bloom's taxonomy. Validation was conducted by 11 expert judges selected according to Fehring's criteria, using an adapted instrument and the Content Validity Index (CVI), with a value of 0.90 or higher considered valid.All evaluated items of the scripts achieved full agreement among the judges, with a mean CVI of 1.0. The scenarios incorporate both typical and atypical signs and symptoms of stroke and are applicable for training prehospital care teams.The validated simulated scenarios have the potential to enhance the training of prehospital care professionals, promoting the early recognition of stroke across different regional contexts in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.