Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41856487›Full record

ReviewPharmacopsychiatry2026

Blocking the Reflection: Milestones and Hurdles for Digital Twins in Mental Health.

Falk Gerrik Verhees, Isabella Catharina Wiest, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Joseph Kambeitz, Pavol Mikolas

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacopsychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A survey on ethical digital twins in healthcare.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Falk Gerrik VerheesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6808-2968
Isabella Catharina WiestDepartment of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherDepartment of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Joseph KambeitzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Pavol MikolasDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung PATH, grant number 16KISA100KDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft IRTG2773, grant number 454245598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Artificial intelligence in mental health has emerged as a potent tool to foster precision psychiatry, for example, by stratifying patient populations. A potential step forward would be mental health digital twins-the independent in-silico reconstruction of an individual person within their functional social and environmental systems that continuously incorporate all known and available subject parameters to predict patient trajectories including the outcomes of interventions. Generative artificial intelligence in the form of large language models demonstrated the ability to mimic human responses and integrate diverse sources of information that may foster the development of digital twins. We give a brief historical perspective on concepts and milestones of artificial intelligence in mental health and outline the current state of clinical decision support systems, monitoring and therapy applications based on artificial intelligence. We describe their integration in large behavioral models as a recently met precondition for digital twins and contrast this development with the magnificent hurdles that remain to truly realize clinical benefits of digital twins, from data quality and regulatory compliance to user engagement and public trust, for some of which we propose mitigation strategies here.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMental HealthDigital HealthGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41856487
PMCPMC13155854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.