ReviewPharmacopsychiatry2026
Blocking the Reflection: Milestones and Hurdles for Digital Twins in Mental Health.
Review in Pharmacopsychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrative Review of Digital Twins in the Health Domain: Development, Application, and Evidence Consolidation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A survey on ethical digital twins in healthcare.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abstract: Artificial intelligence in mental health has emerged as a potent tool to foster precision psychiatry, for example, by stratifying patient populations. A potential step forward would be mental health digital twins-the independent in-silico reconstruction of an individual person within their functional social and environmental systems that continuously incorporate all known and available subject parameters to predict patient trajectories including the outcomes of interventions. Generative artificial intelligence in the form of large language models demonstrated the ability to mimic human responses and integrate diverse sources of information that may foster the development of digital twins. We give a brief historical perspective on concepts and milestones of artificial intelligence in mental health and outline the current state of clinical decision support systems, monitoring and therapy applications based on artificial intelligence. We describe their integration in large behavioral models as a recently met precondition for digital twins and contrast this development with the magnificent hurdles that remain to truly realize clinical benefits of digital twins, from data quality and regulatory compliance to user engagement and public trust, for some of which we propose mitigation strategies here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.