ReviewTransplantation and cellular therapy2026
Statistical Methods for Chimeric Antigen Receptor Cell Therapy Outcomes: A Review and Practical Considerations.
Review in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is being increasingly used as a cutting-edge treatment for blood cancers. Although the number of scientific articles focused on its outcomes is increasing, there is limited literature providing guidance on appropriate statistical analysis methods for CAR-T therapy studies. Statistical approaches applied to CAR-T therapy outcome analysis often use methods adopted from hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT); however, there are important differences between these therapies that must be accounted for in the outcomes analysis. Additionally, much of the literature on CAR-T therapy outcomes is focused on clinical trials, which differ from real-world settings in the long-term follow-up of these patients. There are some statistical challenges in analyzing CAR-T therapy data, such as defining patients' response to therapy and quantifying the duration of response. Although some outcomes, such as overall survival and treatment-related mortality, are seen in both HCT and CAR-T therapy studies, some post-therapy complications are unique to CAR-T cell therapies, and their statistical analysis should be given careful consideration. Other challenges include establishing the appropriate time origin for each outcome, determining censoring time, and defining competing risks. Here we propose to define common CAR-T therapy outcomes, describe appropriate statistical approaches for their analyses, and address these critical statistical challenges based on the observational data collected by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. We used observational data to illustrate these statistical methods for analyzing CAR-T therapy outcomes. © 2026 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.