Observational studyJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
Atezolizumab-bevacizumab in very elderly with hepatocellular carcinoma: Age alone is not a limiting factor except in ALBI grade 3.
Observational study in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06416683 (Study of the Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Combination Recommended in a Multidisciplinary Consultation Meeting in Caen for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of the Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Combination Recommended in a Multidisciplinary Consultation Meeting in Caen for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsEvidence on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AtezoBev) in very elderly people with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains rare in the European ancestry population. We compared outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years with younger patients.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included patients treated with first-line AtezoBev for advanced HCC. Patients aged ≥75 years were matched 1:1 with those <75 years using propensity scores. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed.
resultsAmong 814 patients, 566 (69.5%) were <75 years (median age 64, 84% male) and 248 (30.5%) ≥75 years (median age 78, 86% male). After matching, 484 were analyzed. After a median follow-up of 28.0 months, OS and PFS were similar in ≥75 and <75 (15.4 vs. 16.07 months; p = 0.936), (7.2 vs. 6.5 months; p = 0.706) respectively. Age ≥ 75 years was not associated with PFS nor OS. In patients aged ≥75 years, modified albumin-bilirubin grade 3 (mALBI) was the only factor associated with disease progression (HR 4.37, 95% CI 2.04,9.37; p <0.001) and mortality (HR 5.62, 95% CI 2.47,12.8; p <0.001). In mALBI 3 median OS and PFS were 5.43 and 2.3 months, respectively. Immune-related AEs were less frequent in ≥75 including (22.1% vs. 36.9%; p <0.001) or excluding dysthyroidism (15.9% vs. 25.9%; p = 0.01). In univariate analysis, OS and PFS were longer in patients ≥75 years who developed hypertension (p = 0.04 and p = 0.09), proteinuria (p <0.0001 and p = 0.015) and Immune-related AEs (p = 0.02 and p = 0.007). Hypertension during treatment was associated with proteinuria (odds ratio = 13.1; 95% CI 4.1-42.4), without difference at baseline (p = 0.35).
conclusionsAtezoBev is effective and safe in patients ≥75 years but mALBI 3 warrants particular caution. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Very elderly patients (≥75) are underrepresented in immunotherapy trials, leaving uncertainty about the benefit-risk of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in this subgroup. In real-world practice, European ancestry patients ≥75 with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma are common. Our study indicates that atezolizumab-bevacizumab is generally safe and effective in this population, with mALBI grade 3 as a notable high-risk exception. Although retrospective, the use of propensity score methods mitigates confounding and supports the robustness of our conclusions. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06416683.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.