ReviewJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2026
Review: Potential of Food Plants to Contribute to Human Intake of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.
Review in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of anthropogenic chemicals that are ubiquitous in the environment. This review examined potential human exposure to PFAS through consumption of food plants, collating PFAS-plant bioaccumulation data, and highlighting the influence of different uptake factors. For commonly measured PFAS, significantly higher concentrations were reported in vegetative plants than in other edible portions. Estimated daily intake (EDI) values were calculated using minimum and maximum PFAS-plant bioaccumulation values and food consumption data for 3 countries. Food plants contributed the greatest EDI of any exposure route, accounting for up to 91.9% and 99.5% under maximum and minimum exposure conditions, respectively. In Australia and the US, wheat was the largest contributor to ∑PFAS maximum EDI from food plants, contributing 82.5-83.9%, due to the high consumption rate of wheat products. Due to regional differences in food consumption between northern and southern China, significant differences in PFAS EDIs were calculated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.