ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2026
Household energy use and health in low-income and middle-income countries.
Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proxy-based modeling of indoor air pollution exposure and nonlinear health patterns in biomass-dependent households using machine learning.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Exposure to indoor wood smoke, rather than hypoxemia, is a risk factor for cognitive impairment in COPD patients living at high altitude.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
At the household level, energy powers human health and wellbeing, enabling essential services such as cooking, lighting, communications, heating, cooling, and ventilation. Despite the recognised need for reliable clean energy, access remains deeply unequal, with high-income households benefiting from modern energy sources while over 600 million people do not have access to electricity and 2-3 billion people rely on biomass fuels as an energy source to meet basic household needs. 2-3 million deaths annually are attributed to household air pollution (HAP) from the combustion of these fuels. HAP degrades ambient air quality and contributes to climate change. Studies of household energy and HAP largely focus on cooking-related emissions and might underestimate the true effect of energy use at home to meet a variety of needs, such as heating and lighting. This Series paper reviews the methods used to estimate the HAP disease burden, evaluates the current epidemiological evidence, and examines the health effects of interventions aimed at cleaner energy adoption. Despite differences in methodology, exposure assessment approaches, or the specific health outcomes considered, estimates of global deaths attributable to HAP exposure consistently remain in the millions each year. Thus, this Series paper also identifies areas for future research, emphasising the need for equitable access to clean energy, especially in low-income and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.