Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41856095›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2026

Eliminating prediction bias in CO2 emission models for lactating cows by incorporating feed intake: accurate quantification of methane-reducing effects using a CO2-based method, demonstrated by a case study on 3-nitrooxypropanol.

Kohei Oikawa, Fuminori Terada, Mitsunori Kurihara, Tomoyuki Suzuki, Itoko Nonaka, Kenji Hosoda, Yuko Kamiya, Sanggun Roh, Satoshi Haga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kohei OikawaInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Ibaraki, Japan. oikawa.kohei085@naro.go.jp.
Fuminori TeradaMito Research Center, Meiji Feed Co., Ibaraki, Japan.
Mitsunori KuriharaOffice of Smart Sustainable Agri-food Systems, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Ibaraki, Japan.
Tomoyuki SuzukiInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tochigi, Japan.
Itoko NonakaInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Ibaraki, Japan.
Kenji HosodaKyusyu-Okinawa Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Kumamoto, Japan.
Yuko KamiyaInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tochigi, Japan.
Sanggun RohGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Satoshi HagaGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JPJ011299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe methane (CH4) emission prediction method, using predicted CO2 emissions and the CH4:CO2 concentration ratio, faces challenges in evaluating the efficacy of CH4-reducing feed additives due to CO2 prediction bias associated with energy utilization efficiency. We hypothesized that incorporating dry matter intake (DMI), along with metabolic body weight (MBW) and energy-corrected milk (ECM) as explanatory variables, would reduce this bias. The primary objective was to compare the performance of CO2 emission models with and without including DMI. The secondary objective was to assess the CO2-based method's applicability for quantifying CH4-reducing effects, through a case study of 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP).

methodsPrediction models for CO2 emissions were developed including DMI, MBW, and ECM as explanatory variables, based on 219 records obtained from previous experiments with Holstein cows using respiration chambers or headboxes. The model performance was evaluated using cross-validation. Bias associated with energy utilization efficiency was assessed. The applicability of the CO2-based method to quantify the CH4-reducing effect of 3-NOP was assessed using data obtained from the literature, including 10 studies with 22 treatment and control mean comparisons. The agreement between the observed and predicted CH4 reductions was assessed.

resultsCombining DMI along with MBW and ECM improved the predictive performance of CO2 emissions. While the models without DMI showed bias associated with energy utilization efficiency, it was eliminated when DMI was incorporated. Applicability assessment demonstrated that the models without DMI systematically underestimated the CH4-reducing effect of 3-NOP. In contrast, the models with DMI showed smaller discrepancies between observed and predicted CH4 reductions.

conclusionThis study highlights the importance of incorporating DMI as an explanatory variable to achieve accurate and unbiased predictions of CO2 emissions. These findings would contribute to the appropriate application of the CO2-based method for evaluating the CH4-reducing effects of feed additives.

Indexed as

Dry Matter IntakeHolsteinMethane EmissionsSniffer Method

Identifiers

PMID41856095
PMCPMC13243994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.