Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41855805›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Research note: Age and time of day influence broiler use of platform enrichments.

Shawna L Weimer, Michael T Kidd, Mitchell Vaught, Seth Holeyfield, Benjamin Angel, Pablo Ruidiaz Escovar, Rovin Sanjur Caballero, Karen Pitty Rivera, Elle Johnston, Seong W Kang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shawna L WeimerDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States. Electronic address: sweimer@uark.edu.
Michael T KiddDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Mitchell VaughtDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Seth HoleyfieldDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Benjamin AngelDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Pablo Ruidiaz EscovarDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Rovin Sanjur CaballeroDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Karen Pitty RiveraDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Elle JohnstonDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Seong W KangDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Rosie H WhittleDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, 1260 W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental enrichments have the potential to improve broiler chicken welfare. Platforms, when designed and placed effectively, can improve spatial complexity and encourage positive natural behavior. This study evaluated the spatial and temporal patterns of platform use in broilers housed with sidewall-mounted platforms compared to unenriched controls. A total of 352 male broilers were randomly assigned to one of two environmental enrichment treatments: enriched pens with white plastic slatted platforms placed along both sidewalls (Platform, n=6 pens) and unenriched controls with no platforms (Control, n=2 pens). Overhead video recordings were captured, and behavioral observations of side occupancy were conducted using instantaneous scan sampling at 15-min intervals for 24 h on d 16, 23, 30, 37, 44, and 50 of age. Birds in platform pens had greater side occupancy than controls at all ages and lighting conditions, except during the photoperiod on d 50. The most pronounced differences occurred at younger ages during the scotoperiod, with over 80% of the birds on the sides of platform pens during the scotoperiod on d 16 and 23, compared to less than 40% in control pens (P<0.0001). Less pronounced platform use patterns were observed during the photoperiod. The most significant difference in side occupancy during the photoperiod was on d 30, where 27% more birds were on the sides in platform pens compared to controls (P<0.0001). Taken together, these results suggest that even in the absence of platforms, broilers showed a preference for the sides of the pen (thigmotaxic behavior) during the scotoperiod. The presence of platforms augmented this behavior, particularly during the scotoperiod and at younger to mid-growth ages.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal WelfareBehavior, AnimalChickensHousing, AnimalAge FactorsAnimalsMalePhotoperiodRandom AllocationTime FactorsBroilerPlatform enrichmentScotoperiodWall-hugging behaviorWelfare

Identifiers

PMID41855805
PMCPMC13018968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.