ArticleJMIR cancer2026
Scan, Screen, Support-A Digital Pathway for Assessing Supportive Care Needs in Oncology: Implementation Study.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electronic patient-reported outcome tools have the potential to enhance supportive care in oncology and support the timely and accurate identification of patients' needs. Objective: This study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a user-friendly, web-based digital screening tool at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center that systematically and efficiently assesses the supportive care needs of patients with cancer and enables direct referral to appropriate supportive services through seamless integration with the hospital information system. Methods: An interdisciplinary team collaborated with the IT department and the company CANKADO, an electronic patient-reported outcome provider, to create a 14-item digital questionnaire. The tool incorporated validated instruments, such as the Distress Thermometer, the Nutrition Risk Screening, and a short form of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale, aligned with German Cancer Society certification criteria. Patients accessed the questionnaire via QR codes. Screening results were automatically transferred to the hospital information system, where supportive care requests (SCRs) were generated automatically if indicated. Results: Between June 2024 and May 2025, a total of 8855 QR codes were generated. Of these, 4909 questionnaires were complete and valid for analysis. This information produced 3324 SCRs. Digital screenings resulted in an SCR in 22.4% of cases for psycho-oncology, 18.7% for nutrition, and 27.6% for palliative care. The digital screening maintained or slightly improved screening rates compared to prior methods. Conclusions: The implementation of a digital supportive care screening was feasible and effective within the Comprehensive Cancer Center setting. Future efforts should focus on overcoming barriers for patients with limited digital access or capabilities to ensure the delivery of equitable supportive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.