Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41855433›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Translating Telehealth Communication Research Into Patient-Centered, Implementable Practice.

Rachel Pittmann, Paula D Koppel, David Barrett

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel Pittmann *Center for Interprofessional Education and Practice, MGH Institute of Health Professions, 36 1st Avenue, Charlestown, MA, 02129, United States, 1 (617) 724-9852.ORCID 0009-0001-6981-2811
Paula D Koppel *School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7105-1575
David BarrettDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4308-4219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Understanding both patient and clinician perspectives on communication challenges in virtual primary care consultations is important to ensure safe and effective care. This commentary reviews the important work of Alboksmaty and colleagues, highlighting their contributions and noting some limitations. To further support translation of clinical practice-based recommendations from this original research, this commentary relates the study findings to patient-centered communication frameworks and evidence-based virtual communication strategies. This commentary also extends the helpful mitigation strategies offered in the original research, demonstrating how they apply to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementation framework to facilitate organization-based change. The need for additional research differentiating phone-based and videoconferencing-based primary care consultation communication strategies is highlighted.

Indexed as

CommunicationPrimary Health CareTelemedicineHealth Plan ImplementationHealth Services ResearchHumansPatient-Centered CareVideoconferencingpatient-centered communicationphone-based virtual caretelehealthtelemedicinevideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID41855433
PMCPMC13001997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.