ArticleJournal of global health2026
Development of a clinical algorithm-based scoring system to diagnose smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Sabah, Malaysia using the modified Delphi method.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health threat, particularly in resource-constrained settings where delayed diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary TB (SNPTB) is common due to limited access to rapid molecular diagnostics. We aimed to develop a clinical algorithm-based scoring system to aid the diagnosis of SNPTB among symptomatic patients in Sabah, Malaysia. Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi process between January and June 2024 involving three rounds of expert consultation via email to identify key clinical parameters for diagnosing SNPTB, followed by a consensus meeting to finalise the parameters and assign weightings. We then applied the algorithm to a data set of 60 symptomatic smear-negative individuals, of whom 29 were confirmed to be TB and 31 not TB based on culture. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of the algorithm to obtain a cut-off score for 'likely TB' vs. 'unlikely TB'. Results: Of 27 invited experts, 23 (85.2%) consented to participate in the Delphi process and contributed to the final consensus. Fifty-four parameters were identified in round 1, reduced to 26 in round 2 and 23 in round 3. Following the consensus meeting, we incorporated 21 weighted parameters (scores 1-10) into the final algorithm. The clinical algorithm achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88. A cut-off score of 19.5 differentiated 'likely TB' from 'unlikely TB', yielding a sensitivity of 86.2%, specificity of 77.4%, PPV of 78.1%, and NPV of 85.7%. Conclusions: This diagnostic clinical algorithm could help doctors practicing in resource-constrained settings to diagnose SNPTB. A next step for research would be the prospective validation of the algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.