ArticlePloS one2026
Reliability and validity of the fixed-frame portable dynamometer in assessing ankle force sense in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeficits in sagittal-plane ankle force sense impair the ankle strategy for counteracting perturbations and are associated with balance impairments in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). However, standardized assessment devices, such as the CON-TREX dynamometry system, are expensive and impractical. In this study, a fixed-frame portable dynamometer (FF-PD) was developed, and its concurrent validity, discriminant validity, and test-retest inter-session reliability were evaluated in measuring ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion force sense in individuals with CAI, copers, and healthy controls.
methodsA total of 72 participants (24 with CAI, 24 copers, and 24 healthy controls) performed force-matching tests utilizing the FF-PD and CON-TREX, and the FF-PD retested one week later. Concurrent validity was evaluated with Pearson correlations; discriminant validity, with one-way ANOVA and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses; and reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95).
resultsFF-PD exhibited moderate-to-strong correlations with CON-TREX (r = 0.597-0.770, p ≤ 0.002). For discriminant validity, the FF-PD effectively distinguished individuals with CAI from healthy controls in plantarflexion (p = 0.011) and dorsiflexion (p = 0.034). ROC-derived cutoffs were 12.06% for plantarflexion and 9.57% for dorsiflexion. Test-retest inter-session reliability was good-to-excellent (ICC = 0.794-0.960), with low SEM (0.9%-2.6%) and clinically meaningful MDC95 (2.5%-7.4%).
conclusionThe FF-PD is a valid and reliable device for assessing ankle force sense in plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. It effectively differentiates individuals with CAI from healthy controls, and ROC-derived cutoff values provide clinically interpretable thresholds that may support clinical screening and decision-making, as well as the potential use in monitoring changes during clinical screening and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.