ArticlePloS one2026
ITS2 and 18S rRNA gene sequence-structure phylogeny of the Haptophyta (Haptista).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phylogeny of haptophytes, a diverse and ecologically significant group of microalgae, remains incompletely resolved despite extensive molecular studies. In this study, we apply a sequence-structure phylogenetic framework to the Haptophyta, utilizing ribosomal RNA (rRNA) small subunit (SSU) gene (18S; nearly complete sequences) and internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) datasets. By integrating secondary structure information during sequence alignment and tree inference, we aim to enhance phylogenetic resolution and clarify evolutionary relationships within this lineage. Our taxon sampling reduced over 40,000 available 18S sequences to 396 representatives, alongside a compilation of 224 ITS2 sequences. Comparative modeling and homology-based structure prediction revealed both conserved and variable features in 18S and ITS2 secondary structures, with notable deviations in certain taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) subset phylogenies based on 18S sequence-structure data showed the greatest congruence with established taxonomy, such as the division between calcifying and non-calcifying lineages. In contrast, ITS2 data presented alignment challenges due to high sequence variability, length differences, and limited taxon representation. Incorporating secondary structure information improved alignment quality and reduced phylogenetic artifacts, though ITS2 remained unsuitable for resolving deep relationships among haptophytes. Instead, ITS2 proved more valuable for distinguishing closely related species. While bootstrap support values were similar between sequence-only and sequence-structure approaches, the latter suggested alternative phylogenetic placements that better aligned with previous studies (using multiple markers or also some partial 18S sequences); for Hayaster perplexus in particular, these placements also better matched morphological data. Our results underscore the critical impact of taxon sampling and methodological choices on phylogenetic outcomes. Despite these challenges, the 18S sequence-structure ML tree offers a reliable depiction of haptophyte phylogeny, even though some backbone relationships remain weakly supported. Overall, this study highlights both the benefits and limitations of integrating RNA secondary structure into molecular phylogenetics and advances our understanding of haptophyte evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.