ArticlePloS one2026
Neural substrates of treatment-resistant schizophrenia and the response to clozapine: A structural MRI study in a clinical setting.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting the responsiveness to clozapine among individuals with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is difficult. A candidate predictor of clozapine response is the length of time prior to the introduction of clozapine treatment. The relationship between this measure and structural MRI findings has not been established. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe compared the cortical-volume ratio between patients with TRS (n = 40 including 20 clozapine-treated patients) and non-TRS patients with schizophrenia (n = 64) and between each of these patient groups and healthy controls (HCs). We then investigated brain regions related to both responsiveness to clozapine and the duration between the TRS designation and the introduction of clozapine.
resultsThe three-group comparison revealed that compared to the HCs, both patient groups had significantly lower cortical-volume ratios in widespread brain regions. However, there was no significant difference in the brain regions between the TRS and non-TRS groups: compared to the non-TRS group, the TRS group showed smaller volumes in a wider range of brain regions only at the uncorrected level. The correlational analysis of regions related to clozapine responsiveness did not identify any region that survived the correction for multiple comparisons. No relationship between any cortical region and the length of time prior to clozapine introduction was observed.
conclusionOverall, these results failed to identify the cortical region responsible for the treatment response to clozapine. The lack of correlations between the length of time prior to clozapine introduction and cortical regions might have been derived by insufficient statistical power, thus necessitating further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.