Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41855008›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026

Implementing key quality performance metrics improves colorectal adenoma detection: Evidence from India.

Sonmoon Mohapatra, Ashutosh Mohapatra, Nitin Jagtap, Krushna Chandra Pani, Gurunath Bhange, Vivek Kaul, Nageshwar Reddy, Mahesh K Goenka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sonmoon Mohapatra *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sai Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751 001, India. sonmoon0mohapatra@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7381-6559
Ashutosh Mohapatra *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sai Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751 001, India.
Nitin JagtapDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
Krushna Chandra PaniDepartment of Pathology, Trichrome Diagnostics, Bhubaneswar, 753 003, India.
Gurunath BhangeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sai Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751 001, India.
Vivek KaulDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Nageshwar ReddyDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
Mahesh K GoenkaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, Kolkata, 700 054, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising in India, yet formal screening programs are lacking, in part due to the perceived low adenoma prevalence. This study aimed at evaluating the impact of quality improvement measures on adenoma detection rate (ADR) in a real world Indian setting and identifying factors associated with adenoma detection.

methodsIn this single-center study, consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing colonoscopy between September 2022 and August 2024 were included. Colonoscopy data from September 2022 to August 2023 served as a retrospective control arm, while those from September 2023 to August 2024 formed the prospective intervention arm, following implementation of standardized quality-focused withdrawal techniques.

resultsOf 2260 patients (mean age 47.3 ± 13.8 years, 69% male), 1265 were in the intervention arm. The intervention arm showed significantly higher polyp detection rates (32.7% vs. 11.0%) and ADR (20.5% vs. 6.3%) compared to controls (p < 0.0001), with no difference in CRC detection (1.8% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.48). ADR increased with age: 11.1% in < 45 years, 27.9% in ≥ 45 years and 36.2% in > 60 years. Independent predictors of adenoma detection included implementation of quality improvement measures (OR 3.3), age ≥ 45 years (OR 3.0), male sex (OR 1.6) and withdrawal time ≥ 6 min (OR 1.8) (all p < 0.0001).

conclusionImplementation of quality improvement measures and standardized withdrawal techniques significantly improved ADR in an Indian clinical practice setting. These findings support the adoption of quality-focused practices and provide epidemiological insights relevant to CRC screening strategies in developing countries like India.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdenoma detection rateColon polypColorectal cancerColorectal cancer in IndiaPolyp detection rateWithdrawal time

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.