ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Development of a 3D-printed canine head phantom for veterinary radiotherapy.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of Three-Dimensional Anatomical Models of Dogs with Congenital Extrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this work was to develop the Ultimate Phantom Dog for Orthovoltage Glioma treatment (UPDOG), an anatomical canine head phantom for quality assurance (QA) tests of kilovoltage (kV) radiotherapy treatments. A computed tomography (CT) scan of a canine glioma patient was segmented into bone and soft tissue then converted to stereolithographic files and smoothed. A slit to accommodate a radiochromic film (RCF) was added at the location of the tumor. UPDOG was 3D printed using soft tissue and bone-equivalent materials. CT scans of UPDOG were acquired on a clinical CT scanner. An RCF was irradiated with a kV x-ray source from two angles, with the measured dose compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The contrast between bone and soft tissue was 49, 47 and 50 HU for the 80, 100, and 120 kVp scans, respectively. Irradiations delivered a maximum dose of 284 mGy to the RCF. Along the depth dose curve a mean absolute difference of 3.3 ± 3.3% was measured. Along 1-D dose profiles, a mean peak absolute difference of 2% was measured with a 1.9 mm larger full width at half maximum on the RCF. We have demonstrated that UPDOG is a useful QA tool for kV canine radiotherapy. UPDOG successfully mimicked the dog anatomy with a reduced but measurable bone contrast. Similarly, the dose delivered to the tumor can be successfully measured with an RCF with acceptable dose accuracy along the central axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.