ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
From Early Models to Emerging Trends: The Evolution of Computational Hemolysis Prediction.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical hemolysis remains one of the most critical complications associated with blood-contacting devices. Computational prediction of blood damage has been widely adopted as a key tool for evaluating the hemolytic potential of cardiovascular devices. Although numerical hemolysis modeling has been investigated since the 1990s, a universally accurate and predictive approach is still lacking. This review traces the evolution of computational hemolysis models, from the earliest stress-based power-law formulation to recent strain-based approaches that describe the red blood cells at cellular and molecular levels. It examines the various definitions of the power-law shear stress found in literature, including Von Mises-like formulations, extensions incorporating extensional or Reynolds stresses and those based on turbulent dissipation rate or deformation of the red blood cell. The broad range of power-law constants reported in literature is summarized, together with their development conditions. Furthermore, the Lagrangian and Eulerian approaches used for numerical hemolysis predictions are analyzed in detail. Finally, emerging trends and future directions are highlighted, offering insights into the pathways toward more reliable hemolysis modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.