Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854963›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2026

A Systematic Review of Genes Affecting Endocochlear Potential.

Darcey A Kirwin, Morag A Lewis, Karen P Steel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Darcey A KirwinWolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Morag A LewisWolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Karen P SteelWolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK. karen.steel@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8019-5359

Funding

Wellcome Trust 221769/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHearing loss is highly heterogeneous. Any one of hundreds of genes and dozens of cell types can be involved in the pathological processes in the auditory system. One class of hearing loss results from a reduction of the endocochlear potential (EP), a voltage maintained in the endolymph that bathes the upper surface of the sensory hair cells in the cochlea. Understanding the landscape of genes involved in reduced EP will be useful in developing targeted therapies for this type of hearing loss. Here we review these genes.

methodsResearch articles that report genes impacting EP in mutant mice were collated using several different approaches. Cell type-specific expression and patterns in their biological function were investigated.

resultsWe report 55 genes associated with reduced EP as well as 43 genes shown to underlie deafness but with no change in EP. We show that of these 55 reduced EP genes, 27 are linked to deafness in humans and therefore these patient populations are candidates for having a reduced EP. We demonstrate that the expression of reduced EP genes is not clustered to a particular cell type within the stria vascularis or organ of Corti.

conclusionThis analysis highlights the broad range of expression patterns and functions of genes involved in generating and maintaining the mammalian EP. Furthermore, the lists presented here can inform the direction of translational research for different forms of human hearing loss.

Indexed as

CochleaHearing LossAnimalsDeafnessHumansMiceDeafnessEndocochlear potentialGeneticsMouseStria vascularis

Identifiers

PMID41854963
PMCPMC7619118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.