ArticleGeroScience2026
The stop signal stepping task: how action cancellation commands disrupt step initiation in young and healthy older adults.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Combined Physical and Cognitive Stimulation on Go/No-Go Performance in Older Women: A Pilot and Feasibility Study.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Action cancellation - the ability to rapidly cancel an initiated movement in response to unexpected events - has been extensively studied in the upper limb using the stop signal task (SST). During gait, action cancellation is critical to stop and modify steps to avoid unexpected hazards and prevent falls. By adapting the SST to step initiation, this study investigated how the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) and foot-lift phases of forward stepping were influenced by action-cancellation commands, and whether these processes changed with healthy ageing. Twenty-seven young (M = 28.7 years) and 29 healthy older adults (M = 70.1 years) performed SST variants involving stepping, foot tapping, and finger button-pressing. Across conditions, older adults exhibited slower response execution speed and more slowing when stop cues were anticipated, yet their stopping speed did not differ from that of young adults. When an APA was initiated in a step cancellation trial, the magnitude of the preparatory weight shift toward the step leg did not differ between trials in which foot-lift was successfully cancelled and those in which foot-lift still occurred. Foot-lift could be cancelled when stop cues were presented at similar phases of step preparation for young and older adults. These results suggest that the initial loading of the step leg is ballistic, however as weight transfers toward the stance leg, external stop cues can decouple the APA and foot-lift step phases. While older adults exhibited slower action initiation, a greater reliance on proactive inhibition under conditions of uncertainty may help preserve stopping efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854955What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.