Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854955›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

The stop signal stepping task: how action cancellation commands disrupt step initiation in young and healthy older adults.

Rebecca Healey, Marlee J Wells, Sauro E Salomoni, Rohan Puri, Mark R Hinder, Rebecca J St George

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca HealeySchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5018-3787
Marlee J WellsWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9990-2498
Sauro E SalomoniSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-9003
Rohan PuriSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0231-1369
Mark R HinderSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-4790
Rebecca J St GeorgeSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. rebecca.stgeorge@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-1069

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200101696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action cancellation - the ability to rapidly cancel an initiated movement in response to unexpected events - has been extensively studied in the upper limb using the stop signal task (SST). During gait, action cancellation is critical to stop and modify steps to avoid unexpected hazards and prevent falls. By adapting the SST to step initiation, this study investigated how the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) and foot-lift phases of forward stepping were influenced by action-cancellation commands, and whether these processes changed with healthy ageing. Twenty-seven young (M = 28.7 years) and 29 healthy older adults (M = 70.1 years) performed SST variants involving stepping, foot tapping, and finger button-pressing. Across conditions, older adults exhibited slower response execution speed and more slowing when stop cues were anticipated, yet their stopping speed did not differ from that of young adults. When an APA was initiated in a step cancellation trial, the magnitude of the preparatory weight shift toward the step leg did not differ between trials in which foot-lift was successfully cancelled and those in which foot-lift still occurred. Foot-lift could be cancelled when stop cues were presented at similar phases of step preparation for young and older adults. These results suggest that the initial loading of the step leg is ballistic, however as weight transfers toward the stance leg, external stop cues can decouple the APA and foot-lift step phases. While older adults exhibited slower action initiation, a greater reliance on proactive inhibition under conditions of uncertainty may help preserve stopping efficiency.

Indexed as

AgeingAnticipatory postural adjustmentChoice stepping reaction timeInhibitory controlStop signal task

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.