ReviewPituitary2026
Non-written guidelines in pituitary tumor surgery. The hidden curriculum.
Review in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough clinical guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for pituitary tumor management, real-world surgical practice also relies on non-written rules derived from tacit knowledge, experiential judgment, and shared professional norms. These principles help clinicians manage complexity and uncertainty, not fully addressed by formal protocols. This review aims to identify non-written guidelines across the perioperative continuum of pituitary surgery and to examine how they complement established patient safety frameworks.
methodsWe examined recurring clinical heuristics transmitted through institutional mentorship, multidisciplinary case discussions, and accumulated perioperative experience. Identified non-written guidelines were organized into preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and institutional domains, and contextualized through reference to contemporary literature.
resultsNon-written guidelines were found to play a role in complication prevention and in supporting coordinated multidisciplinary team performance. When articulated, these heuristics enhance situational awareness, support adaptive decision-making, and promote consistency of care, particularly within Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence.
conclusionsSystematic articulation of non-written guidelines may help translate formal protocols into daily clinical practice, supporting safer care, more effective training, and more consistent performance in pituitary tumor surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854935What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.