ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Agreement of CT versus MRI in reinvestigation of patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis. a comparison of surgically and non-surgically treated levels.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical decision-making for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) depends on accurate imaging. MRI is preferred, but contraindications may require CT. This study compared CT‑ and MRI-based measurements of dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) at operated and non-operated levels two years after LSS surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients from the NORDSTEN Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) were evaluated. Patients randomized to spinous process osteotomy (SPO) underwent both CT and MRI at two-year follow-up. Two independent readers measured DSCA on axial MRI at L2–L5. On CT, the inner ligamentous canal boundary was delineated to approximate the DSCA. Mean values were compared using Student’s t‑test, and interobserver reliability assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
resultsOf 149 eligible patients, 96 (64%) completed both imaging modalities. Mean age was 65.9 years, and 66% were male. In total, 274 lumbar levels were analysed, including 123 surgically treated levels. CT produced slightly larger canal areas than MRI: +2 to + 4 mm² at non-operated levels and + 11 to + 14 mm² at operated levels (p < 0.05). Interobserver agreement was good for CT and comparable to MRI (ICC 0.80–0.96).
conclusionsCT and MRI provided broadly comparable measurements of the spinal canal, with small systematic differences. The modestly larger CT areas at surgically treated levels are likely of limited clinical relevance, though their importance in patients with very small canals remains uncertain. CT may serve as a supplementary postoperative modality, but further research is needed before it can be considered a consistent alternative to MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854905What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.