ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
The Global Impact of Specialized Aesthetic Fellowship Training: An International Multi-Center Evaluation of the ISAPS Aesthetic Surgery Fellowship.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStructured aesthetic surgery training during residency is often inadequate, creating a global training gap. The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) established a fellowship program to address this, but its educational impact has not been systematically evaluated. This study provides the first multicenter, international analysis of the ISAPS fellowship's effect on procedural exposure, surgeon confidence, and career trajectory.
methodsAn online survey was distributed to all surgeons who had completed an ISAPS fellowship. The questionnaire captured demographics, residency-level aesthetic surgery exposure, fellowship case volume, perceived educational quality, post-fellowship confidence, and career changes. Trends in confidence across ascending procedural volume were analyzed using the one-sided Jonckheere-Terpstra test.
resultsFour hundred and sixty-nine former ISAPS fellows from 27 countries responded. Respondents reported minimal aesthetic surgery exposure during residency (median score 1 on a 6-point scale). The fellowship provided significant operative experience, with 35.0% of fellows logging over 50 cases in at least one procedure. Post-fellowship, 81.4% of participants reported increased operative confidence, a trend that was statistically significant for several key procedures (p < 0.05). The fellowship reshaped careers, with the proportion of fellows focused primarily on aesthetic surgery rising from 9.5 to 60.4%. Overall satisfaction was high, with 96.2% stating the fellowship pushed their career. The most cited area for improvement was the degree of hands-on surgical experience.
conclusionsThe ISAPS fellowship is a highly effective model for post-residency aesthetic surgery training. It successfully bridges the training gap by providing high-volume operative experience that translates directly into increased surgeon confidence, adoption of new techniques, and a career shift toward aesthetic practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.