ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Demographics and outcomes of unicondylar knee arthroplasty in Türkiye: a nationwide retrospective database study of eight thousand, five hundred and ninety cases.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFavourable long-term clinical and radiological outcomes with low revision and reoperation rates have been reported for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of end-stage unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. However, no information on these data is available for the Turkish population. Our aim was to analyze the demographics, indications, outcomes, and revision rates of UKA in Türkiye using a nationwide database.
methodsThe electronic medical records of 8,590 patients undergoing UKA for unicompartmental osteoarthritis between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data of the study population including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and institution were assessed. The primary outcome measures were complication and revision rates.
resultsOf the 8,590 analyzed patients, 85.2% were women with an average age of 59 ± eight years. The primary indication was osteoarthritis in 7,205 (94.1%) cases. Most patients received cemented implants (78% vs. 22%) and the use of fixed insert designs increased from 18 to 74% between 2018 and 2022. The overall complication rate for the study population was 5.5% (475/8,590). The rate of complications did not differ according to fixation type. However, it was statistically significantly higher in patients who received mobile UKA than the fixed design (3.8% vs. 1.8% for mechanical complications and 1.7% vs. 0.6% for other complications, respectively; P < 0.001). The overall revision rate was 4.4% (234/5,377), with rates being similar for cemented and cementless designs (P = 0.832). However, the revision rate of mobile UKA was significantly higher than that of fixed designs (P < 0.001).
conclusionThe majority of UKAs in Türkiye were cemented implants with an increased usage of fixed bearings over time. Mobile-bearing designs had significantly greater complication and revision rates compared to fixed-bearing implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854873What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.