ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Cord blood versus matched related donor transplantation in AML not in remission: role of pre-engraftment immune reactions.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although HLA-matched related donor transplantation (MRDT) is considered the preferred graft source when available, cord blood transplantation (CBT) is an alternative source, with several studies suggesting a potent graft-versus-leukemia effect. We compared outcomes between CBT and MRDT in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not in remission and examined how pre-engraftment immune reaction (PIR), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and HLA mismatch affect CBT outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 334 patients with AML not in remission who underwent first allo-HSCT using either single-unit CBT (n = 309) or MRDT (n = 25). At 5 years, CBT recipients showed significantly better leukemia-free survival (LFS) (42.0% vs. 17.6%) and lower relapse rates (24.6% vs. 54.0%), with no difference in NRM. Among CBT recipients, patients who developed mild PIR had a lower relapse rate compared with those without PIR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48). In contrast, severe PIR was associated with higher NRM (HR, 3.13) and worse overall survival (HR, 2.12). Acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and HLA disparity were not significantly associated with relapse. CBT was associated with superior LFS compared with MRDT in patients with AML not in remission, and PIR occurrence and severity were associated with CBT outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.