ReviewNeurology and therapy2026
International Expert Opinion on Optimal Switching to Cladribine Tablets from Other High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Opportunities and Challenges.
Review in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- French expert opinion on the long-term management of relapsing multiple sclerosis with cladribine tablets beyond year 4.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is a chronic inflammatory disease usually diagnosed at a young age. Most patients receive several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) over time, but evidence-based guidelines to support treatment sequencing are limited, particularly for switches between high-efficacy DMTs. An international group of experts in the care of RMS reviewed the current evidence and their clinical practice in order to provide recommendations on the optimal therapeutic use of cladribine tablets (CladT, an immune reconstitution therapy for RMS) in patients previously managed on anti-trafficking agents (S1P modulators, natalizumab) or an anti-CD20 agent. Recommendations relate to switching due to breakthrough RMS disease activity or safety/tolerability issues, to reduce the risk of safety concerns, including de-risking in older people with stable RMS, and to facilitate family planning. We propose that CladT is a rational option for people with RMS presenting with intractable safety/tolerability issues during treatment with a high-efficacy DMT, for older patients with stable RMS who have received long-term DMT, or for patients with breakthrough RMS disease activity despite treatment with an S1P modulator. In selected cases, CladT may be considered for patients with breakthrough RMS disease activity on anti-CD20 treatment. It is important to keep the interval between withdrawal of a previous anti-trafficking DMT (especially S1P modulators) and initiation of CladT as short as possible if the switch is intended to address breakthrough RMS disease activity, especially with regard to the prevention of rebound RMS disease activity. Immune reconstitution therapy with CladT may also provide an opportunity to plan for pregnancy in the absence of continuous DMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.