ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
A study on using custom 3D-printed tongue bites for radiotherapy patients with oral tongue carcinoma.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral cavity cancers are a debilitating form of head and neck cancer with high rates of mortality. Radiotherapy is one of the main forms of treatment but relies on minimizing doses that are delivered to organs at risk and considering any motion in the mouth. One solution is to use a block within the mouth which acts to reduce motion and decreases tissue heterogeneity. In this work, we developed a process for designing a customized tissue-equivalent 3D-printed tongue bite and evaluated its impact on the radiation treatment. Six patients with stage III or IV oral cancer were involved. Computed tomography (CT) images for each patient were acquired with currently used Styrofoam tongue bites within the mouth. The designs of 3D tongue bites were prepared using those CT images and then printed on an SLA printer using F80 resin which is a tissue-equivalent and biocompatible material. Secondary CT images were then acquired for each patient with the 3D tongue bites to have a dosimetric comparison. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning was carried out for individual patients on both CT images. Plan parameters, fractionation scheme and optimization priorities were all kept the same. The radiotherapy plans utilizing 3D tongue bites showed better PTV coverage and reduced D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.