Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854769›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

FAP-targeted [

David Ventura, Michael Schäfers, Stefanie Bobe, Florian Büther, Jonas Brandt, Lars Stegger, Philippe Brüggemann, Wolfgang Roll, Kambiz Rahbar, Philipp Schindler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David VenturaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany. david.ventura@ukmuenster.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4346-2606
Michael SchäfersDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Stefanie BobeEuropean Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Florian BütherDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jonas BrandtWest German Cancer Center (WTZ), Münster Site, Münster, Germany.
Lars SteggerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Philippe BrüggemannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Wolfgang RollDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Kambiz RahbarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Philipp SchindlerWest German Cancer Center (WTZ), Münster Site, Münster, Germany.
Philipp BackhausDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePositron emission tomography (PET) using fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI) has emerged as a robust imaging tool for solid tumours. The novel ligand [68Ga]BED003 (formerly known as [68Ga]Ga-OncoFAP-DOTAGA) has demonstrated very high affinity for the fibroblast activation protein and favourable biodistribution. This study aimed to assess the in vivo distribution of [68Ga]BED003 across a spectrum of solid tumours as a potential prerequisite for radioligand therapy.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, [68Ga]BED003 PET/CT or PET/MRI of 157 patients with 19 different solid malignancies were retrospectively analysed. A spherical volume of interest (VOI) was placed over the primary tumour, the most intense lymph node and distant metastases that were evaluated as at least likely malignant in the written reports, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was derived. Liver and blood pool background mean SUV (SUVmean) were assessed using standardised VOIs. Tumour-to-background ratios (TBRmax) were calculated as the ratio of SUVmax to background SUVmean. SUVmax and TBRmax values of primary tumours, lymph node, and distant metastases were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and signed-rank tests, as appropriate.

resultsOverall, 115 primary tumours, 70 lymph node metastases, and 116 distant metastases were analysed, yielding median SUVmax of 16.6, 12.3, and 11.9, respectively. No significant difference in SUVmax or TBRmax were observed between lymph node and distant metastases (all P > 0.05). In contrast, primary tumours demonstrated significantly higher uptake than lymph node and distant metastases (all P < 0.001), except for liver TBRmax when comparing primary tumours with lymph node metastases (P > 0.05). Across all 301 lesions, the median SUVmax, liver TBRmax and blood pool TBRmax was 14.7 (range, 4.2–35.9), 21.6 (range, 4.2–62.8) and 11.1 (range, 3.0–33.4), respectively. The highest median SUVmax and TBRmax (both) in cohorts with > 5 lesions were found in medullary thyroid, oesophageal, ovarian, cervical, breast, colorectal, and hepatocellular cancers.

conclusion[68Ga]BED003-PET demonstrated consistently high uptake across diverse solid malignancies, supporting its potential role as a tool for multi-cancer diagnostic imaging and patient selection for FAP-targeted radioligand therapy.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySerine EndopeptidasesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEndopeptidasesFemaleFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuinolines68Ga-FAPIEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaGallium RadioisotopesMembrane ProteinsQuinolinesRadiopharmaceuticalsSerine EndopeptidasesFAPIOncoFAPPETRadioligand therapySolid Malignancies

Identifiers

PMID41854769
PMCPMC13249670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.