ArticlePsychological research2026
Shades of smiles: creating variants of smiles from neutral images of real individuals - method and validation.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite their crucial role in emotion research, facial expression databases primarily contain stimuli of basic emotions, rather than subtle, socially nuanced ones. Here, we introduce a rigorous yet easily applicable pipeline for synthesizing fine-grained emotional expressions—specifically, reward, affiliative, and dominance smiles—from neutral photographs, guided by Facial Action Coding System (FACS) principles and the perspective that expressions serve as social signals. From neutral images of 90 individuals (45 female, 45 male), we generated five expressions each (including neutral and disgust), and mirrored each image to address hemiface biases. In an online validation study, 13 participants rated each image on emotional content, arousal, and plausibility, yielding 26 ratings per expression and model. Rating results show that (1) reward smiles were most reliably recognized, while affiliative and dominance smiles tended to be confused with related expressions and that (2) arousal and plausibility ratings varied systematically across expression types and model gender. In summary, the suggested expression generation pipeline and the validated stimuli offer a robust method and a scalable dataset for research on fine-grained emotion recognition and emotional communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.