ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2026
Movement Disorders in Tropical Infectious Diseases.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review various types of movement disorders associated with common tropical infectious diseases produced by viruses, bacteria, rickettsia, protozoa and/or parasites. At times, the offending organism almost exclusively affects the central nervous system (CNS) without any significant systemic manifestations, as in neurocysticercosis. RECENT
findingsMovement disorders almost invariably result from direct invasion of the CNS by the offending organism. CNS involvement may occur as a result of brain edema, electrolyte abnormalities, hypoxia, ischemia, haemorrhage, liver and kidney malfunction and/or due to liberation of toxic substances like cytokines and enzymes. Such encephalopathies rarely result in prominent movement disorders other than tremors Finding the exact cause and nature of the causative organism is of utmost importance. Nucleic acid in vitro amplification-based molecular methods are increasingly being applied for routine microbial detection. Advantages are a rapid turnaround and higher sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, these molecular methods performed on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples may be considered as the ‘’new gold standard’’ for diagnosis of CNS infection. Commercially available ‘’panels’’ offer various multiplex PCR assays for convenient testing of targets that cause similar clinical scenarios. Pan-omics molecular platforms possess potential for use in this area. Results generated by these methods need to be carefully interpreted in combination with clinical findings. Using a combination of conventional and molecular diagnostic methods, it has been shown that in approximately two thirds of patients with clinical encephalitis, an etiologic organism could not be identified. Current practice is shifting towards development of advanced techniques beyond nucleic acid-based detection. CSF is the ideal specimen for PCR testing in patients with suspected meningitis or meningoencephalitis. Time of testing from symptom onset is essential to understand and rule out false negative results and recommend retesting within a certain time frame (as in cases of HSV encephalitis). Immunocompromised patients are at risk for infection by a much wider strains of opportunistic pathogens, for example HHV-6, JC virus, Toxoplasma encephalitis among bone marrow transplant recipients and patients with HIV. Often, infection can be more severe (e.g., West Nile Virus) and difficult to diagnose. Nucleic acid in vitro amplification-based molecular diagnosis methods have a wider and better application in clinical microbiology practice. Movement disorders including cerebellar ataxias are rare during any acute encephalitic syndrome (AES). Such disorders may develop after the acute infection as transient phenomenon when they resemble the pathogenesis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) or may result from permanent brain damage during the acute course of the illness. CSF pleocytosis generally favours an infectious etiology, and a normal CSF favors an encephalopathy or non-infectious AES. Geographical and seasonal clustering and other epidemiological characteristics are important in clinical decision making. Clinical markers like eschar, skin rash, myalgias, hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, liver and kidney dysfunction, elevated serum CK, frontal-temporal or thalamic involvement, or anterior horn cell involvement are invaluable clues for the etiological diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854747What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.