ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2026
Cooling effect of urban green spaces: LCZ-based assessment comparing four cities at similar latitudes via hotspot and regression models.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban green spaces (UGSs) are widely recognized as a key strategy to mitigate urban heat islands (UHIs) through evapotranspiration and shading. However, their cooling effectiveness depends not only on size but also on spatial configuration and surrounding urban morphology. This study provides a cross-latitude, local climate zone (LCZ)-based comparative analysis of UGS cooling effects in four medium-sized cities located at similar latitudes but with distinct morphological patterns: Salt Lake City (USA), L’Aquila (Italy), Krakow (Poland), and Kastamonu (Türkiye). Using MODIS-derived land surface temperature (LST), LCZ classification, and Getis-Ord (Gi*) hotspot analysis, we quantified spatial clustering of heat. We identified where parks and natural landscapes are most effective in lowering temperatures. Furthermore, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression was used to establish global relationships between green space coverage and LST, followed by Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) to capture local variations and spatial heterogeneity in this relationship. Results reveal that green areas significantly lower LST, with the strongest cooling observed within 400 m of parks. Rather than treating this buffer distance as a universal planning threshold, the analysis demonstrates that cooling magnitudes and spatial consistency vary systematically across LCZ types and urban contexts. In Salt Lake City, for instance, UGSs reduced temperatures by up to 4.2 °C in compact residential zones (LCZs 2–3). Hot spot analysis further shows that statistically significant heat clusters (95–99% confidence) are concentrated in dense, built-up LCZ types, while cold spots are predominantly associated with natural LCZ classes (A–D). Together, these findings suggest that urban morphology not only influences the presence but also the effectiveness of cooling buffers around green spaces. By integrating LCZ mapping, spatial statistics, and a comparative, cross-latitude design, this study moves beyond distance-based generalisations. It advances urban climate research by demonstrating a transferable yet context-sensitive framework for diagnosing UHI intensity and prioritising green space interventions. The results provide actionable guidance for planners: park siting and design should prioritize heat-prone, high-density zones to maximize cooling benefits and support climate-resilient urban development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.