Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854612›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Colorectal Cancer Risk With Negative Colonoscopy or Nonadherence After Positive FOBT Screening.

Hanna Heyman, Deborah Saraste, Håkan Jonsson, Johannes Blom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanna HeymanDepartment of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Deborah SarasteDepartment of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Håkan JonssonDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Johannes BlomDepartment of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs are implemented globally. When determining screening intervals, variations in the risk of subsequent CRC by colonoscopy outcome should be considered. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of CRC after a negative screening colonoscopy result or nonadherence to colonoscopy in individuals with a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) result. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective cohort study conducted between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2021. It was conducted within a population-based CRC screening program in the Stockholm-Gotland region, Sweden, using biennial FOBT as the primary screening test in the target population aged 60 to 69 years. The study cohort included all men and women born between 1938 and 1954 residing in the Stockholm-Gotland region between 2008 and 2012 who were invited to a CRC screening. All participants with a positive FOBT result were identified. Data provided by national registers were analyzed from October 2024 through January 2026. Exposures: Individuals with a positive FOBT result were categorized as (1) having a negative result on recommended follow-up colonoscopy or (2) nonadherence to recommended follow-up colonoscopy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CRC incidence compared with the general population (defined as all individuals in the cohort who were invited to screening, excluding those with negative colonoscopy or nonadherence following positive FOBT). This was measured by standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Results: Of 318 096 individuals invited to CRC screening with FOBT, 14 873 had a positive FOBT result (7799 male [52.4%]; median [IQR] age, 65 [63-67] years). Of these individuals, 11 473 (87.3%) underwent a colonoscopy, and 8433 of those colonoscopies (73.5%) were negative. Individuals with a negative screening colonoscopy result had a significantly lower observed CRC incidence (SIR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.68) relative to the general population, with a lower SIR in men (0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.56) than women (0.71; 95% CI, 0.49-1.03). In contrast, individuals with a positive FOBT who did not adhere to follow-up colonoscopy had a markedly increased CRC incidence (SIR, 4.21; 95% CI, 3.24-5.48) compared with the general population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, a decrease in CRC incidence was observed among individuals with negative results in screening colonoscopies, with a greater decrease in men, supporting risk-based, individualized follow-up strategies. A high-risk group for CRC was identified among individuals who did not adhere to follow-up colonoscopy, enabling targeted interventions to improve early CRC detection.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningOccult BloodPatient ComplianceAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSweden

Identifiers

PMID41854612
PMCPMC13003367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.